Tuesday, 6 December 2011

TSX Venture Tech Sector Value Comparison

With some of the most widely traded TSX Venture tech sector companies having released their Q3 2011 financials recently, it makes it a great time to review their financial performance to see which company is most undervalued relative to the others. The four companies in this comparison are Fireswirl Technologies, Inc., SelectCore Ltd., Intertainment Media Inc., and Poynt Corporation. The chart below summarizes their shares outstanding, stock price and market capitalization statistics, compiled from tsx.com.


Company NameSymbol  Shares (000's)    Stock Price    Market Cap (000's)
FireswirlFSW             44,641              0.150                           6,696
SelectCoreSCG           123,665              0.260                         32,153
Intertainment MediaINT           312,804              0.455                      142,326
PoyntPYN           479,077              0.140                         67,071


The chart shows that FSW has by far the least amount of shares outstanding, with PYN having the most. INT has the highest market cap while FSW has the lowest. By taking a look into the revenue profile of the last seven quarters (six for INT as they haven't released their Jul-Sep 2011 numbers yet), we can see if these relative market caps are justified.


Revenue (000's)Q1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 2010Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011  Last 4Qs
FSW     4,169      4,778      4,744      6,585      4,177      5,002      5,957 21,722
SCG  20,726   31,666   26,065   24,766   20,987   22,027   21,144 88,925
INT     1,273      1,299      1,379      1,403      1,168      1,375        TBD 5,325
PYN        192         215         255         339         536         573         734 2,182


We see above that SCG has by far the highest amount of revenue at over $20M a quarter, followed by FSW averaging around $5M a quarter, then INT at less than $1.5M and PYN at less than a million a quarter. Looking purely at the revenue numbers doesn't tell us the whole story, however, we must also look at the quality of the revenues being earned.

SCG's revenues have thus far been primarily from the prepaid cell phone card business while the higher margin financial services revenues are still in their infancy stage. INT revenues have been from their legacy digitial publishing business rather than their social media products. Only FSW and PYN earn the bulk of their revenues in their respective industries of focus. PYN's revenues are in their startup phase but growing rather quickly. FSW's revenues are more mature but are also growing at a great pace, particularly in Q3 2011.

The quality of each company's revenues can also be judged by their earnings. See the next two charts for the last 7 quarters of comprehensive net income for each company and net margin as a percentage of total revenues.

 
Net Inc (000's)  Q1 2010  Q2 2010  Q3 2010  Q4 2010  Q1 2011  Q2 2011  Q3 2011  Last 4Qs
FSW-184-91-223-357-223-57079-1,070
SCG-112-37229-352347-599-1,144-1,749
INT-1,418-1,669-1,207-1,347-6,211-4,797          TBD-13,562
PYN-8,953-2,225-2,969-2,772-2,422-3,652-3,963-12,809

 
Net Inc % of Rev  Q1 2010  Q2 2010  Q3 2010  Q4 2010  Q1 2011Q2   2011 Q3  2011  Last 4Qs
FSW-4%-2%-5%-5%-5%-11%1%-5%
SCG-1%-1%0%-1%2%-3%-5%-2%
INT-111%-128%-88%-96%-532%-349%         TBD-255%
PYN-4652%-1036%-1164%-817%-452%-637%-540%-587%


PYN has a signficant burn rate and revenues must be drastically increased before they start to make money. While revenues have increased greatly over last year, so have their costs and the company still sees margins at over -500%. They will likely need $6-7M revenue a quarter before they breakeven which could be 2 years or more away.

INT has a similar bad burn rate that is increasing with time but their business model is a little different. Their primary focus is asset value creation rather than upfront revenues where they burn cash in support of their products in hopes of spinning them off, namely Ortsbo, thus creating value for their shareholders.

SCG is the only company out of the four with two positive earnings quarters under their belt. But their past two quarters' losses have been particularly large as they transform their business.

FSW put up a positive income figure for Q3 2011, a company first, and leads the way as the company that is closest to breakeven as they lost just over $1M for the past four quarters. They are the only company out of the four whose net margin is headed in the right direction.

The final chart will compare some industry revenue and growth metrics. The first metric will be Price to Sales (market cap to revenue), the second will be Q3 2011 revenue growth when compared to Q3 2010 and the third will be YTD 2011 revenue growth vs the first three quarters of 2010. Since INT's Q3 numbers are still pending, their YTD growth comparison will be for the first 6 months of calendar year 2011 vs 2010.


Revenue Metrics    Price to Sales      Q311/Q310 %Incr      Q311/Q310 YTD %Incr
FSW                   0.31 25.6%10.6%
SCG                   0.36 -18.9%-18.2%
INT                26.73                               TBD-1.1%
PYN                30.73 187.7%178.3%


FSW and SCG are very close in terms of price to sales but as mentioned before the quality of those revenues are vastly different. FSW's revenues are solely from their primary focus of operating online retail stores for various brands in China but SCG's revenues currently contain very little of their Iridium prepaid card business plan thus far. FSW's revenues are also growing with a 25.6% Q3 2011 vs Q3 2010 growth rate and 10.6% YTD vs the first three quarters of 2010. SCG's revenues are shrinking during their transition phase, down over 18% for Q3 as well as YTD vs 2010.

INT and PYN are about 100 times more costly in terms of Price to Sales vs the other two companies. PYN has by far the largest % increase in revenues, however it would have to continue this vast increase for several quarters before it gets to a level close to breakeven. Their market cap exceeds FSW's market cap by tenfold despite being much further away from profitability. Both companies have business plans that could see massive growth to revenues so it is way too early to say that one company is justified in having a price to sales metric that is 100 times higher than the other.


Conclusion

While people will find this comparison useful for their own investing purposes, the conclusion is quite clear. FSW has a reasonable amount of shares and a very modest market cap compared to the other three despite having much higher revenues than PYN or INT. They have a fully implemented and growing business plan unlike their comparable SCG who are in the transition phase away from their low-margin legacy revenues. FSW is the closest to profitability based on Q3 2011 numbers and are poised for a big quarter for Q4 based on the seasonality of the online retail business and the contracts they signed to expand their business at the start of Q4.

Click here for a detailed analysis of Fireswirl Technologies

Monday, 5 December 2011

The TSX Venture Tech Sector is Heating Up Again

Read onwards for a tech stock that:

Has an extremely low share float and has a history of a quickly appreciating share price.

Turned a profit in Q3 2011 for the first time and looks to do the same on a strong Q4.

Is less than $6M in market capitalization, which is less than its Q3 revenue.

Its Chinese subsidiary is one of China's fastest growing companies.

Recently signed a contract to run the online sales platform for the "Disney of China", furthering the possibility of exploding future revenue growth.

I'm back after a hiatus over the last few weeks. I'm very picky with my stock recommendations and won't push something unless it is the right time. It was the right time for TRE in June when I recommended the stock in the $2's and sold over $5. It was the right time for FXA when I spotted it as a buyout target in July and it has since been purchased. It was even the right time for CX in September as it was one of the few stocks that gained in price while the market crashed.

Now is the right time for Fireswirl Technologies (TSXV:FSW). The stock closed today at 11.5 cents after a massive sell of 500 shares at market close brought the stock down from 12.5 cents. Manipulation at its finest. The first time I mentioned Fireswirl was very casually in my post here. I mentioned it as a stock that has done well but didn't really recommend it as much of a buy at the time. Several things have changed since then to make me change my mind.


1) The Venture tech sector is heating up

The Venture tech sector is starting to pick up again. Intertainment Media (TSXV:INT), SelectCore (TSXV:SCG) and Poynt (TSXV:PYN) have all enjoyed a good run off of their lows over the last few weeks. During that time Fireswirl has remained rather quiet which shouldn't last very long based on the high correlation between the four stocks. Referring to the comparison chart between the four, FSW clearly shows a lag vs SCG and INT over the last few weeks, starting in early October. The last time such a lag took place was at the start of May. As seen on the chart, FSW's stock price quickly caught up then and it will likely do the same now. It suggests a move to 20-25 cents just to catch up to the recent activity of INT and SCG.


2) Fireswirl is a stock that can explode at any given moment because of its small float

FSW has much fewer shares outstanding compared to INT, SCG and PYN with just 44.6M. The small float has caused it to make huge moves in very short time spans as the company makes headlines. On February 7th of this year the stock opened at 5 cents. By the next day it had reached a high of 38 cents and closed at 23.5 cents.

The second huge run during May was a little more sustained. The run started on May 4th at 13 cents and peaked on May 30th at 54 cents as investors were clearly expecting big things from the company. But since then the stock price has come back down to the 11-15 cent range even with the new signed contracts and excellent Q3 results (discussed below). The company has delivered on the expectations that were set for them, except they've delivered them when no one was looking. Had their Q2 results been as good as their Q3 results, the stock could be trading at over $1 by now. But for now it's trading at just 11.5% of that price, making it excellent buy low opportunity for those investors who are paying attention.


3) The company made money in a quarter for the first time ever in Q3 2011

Fireswirl made $79K in net income in Q3 2011 according to their November 8th SEDAR documents, the first time they ever pulled a profit. Although it was aided by an FX win, the company has a very good chance of being operationally profitable in every quarter going forward based on their revenue growth trajectory and contracts signed.

Review their Q3 results here

"Total operating revenue increased to $5,957,481 and $15,136,428 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4,743,827 and $13,692,034 during the same period in 2010, representing an increase of 25.6% and 10.6%. The merchandise revenue has increased by 22.1% and 11.4% respectively while service revenue has increased by 201.3% and 19.7% respectively offset by no advertising revenue during the current period."

After an ordinary first half of 2011, the company has increased their revenue by over 25% in Q3 since signing an agreement with Logitech to operate their official online store in China. Revenue growth in Q4 should be much greater than 25% thanks to the huge contracts they signed after the close of Q3.


4) Q4 revenues will show record growth thanks to the agreements to operate the Chinese online stores of Casio and the "Disney of China"

Since the close of Q3, the company has signed two important contracts to open and operate online stores in China. The first one was a deal with Casio:

"Fireswirl Technologies Inc. (TSX VENTURE:FSW), "the Company", is pleased to announce that its subsidiary, Beijing Xingchang Xinda Technology Development Co., Ltd. ("XCXD"), has been appointed by Casio (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. to exclusively build and operate its online flagship store in Taobao Mall, the largest online B2C shopping portals in China, and sell original Casio products." 

To understand the potential of this deal for Fireswirl, we need to understand how big Taobao Mall really is. Taobao.com ranks 15th in worldwide Alexa rankings and is third in China. Taobao is the Amazon or eBay of China and a significant player in electronics sales now has their store run by Fireswirl.

Fireswirl also teamed up with Sino Light Enterprise, the licensee of China's #1 animation brand, to run their online stores:

"SLE has engaged XCXD to set up, operate and maintain their official and flagship online stores, namely "XiYangYang Official Online Store" and "XiYangYang Taobao Flagship Store", respectively, to sell apparels with "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf" branding for a term of two years. XCXD is one of China's leading e-commerce platform providers.

SLE has entered into a license agreement with an affiliate of Disney Enterprises, Inc., which in turn is the master licensee of "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf", to manufacture and distribute, through the establishment of retail stores for children's wear for infant and children (from new-born to 14 years old) under the brand of "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf" (the "Products") for three years with an option to renew for another three years in Mainland China."

Signing up SLE is particularly huge. It might be the biggest contract to date in terms of size and change of company philosophy to enhance future growth. While Fireswirl has traditionally signed up non-Chinese companies who wish to sell online within China, the SLE contract debuts the official online store as well as the one in the Taobao mall for a domestic company that has an extremely popular brand within China. From the NR:

"SLE plans to open over 1,100 retail outlets nationwide in the next three years and the first "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf" retail store was opened on October 1, 2011.

"Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf", also known as "XiYangYang", is the No.1 cartoon series in China. In 2010, an animated movie derived from the series broke the domestic box office record for a Chinese produced animated movie."

Think of it from this perspective. Imagine that Disney and their popular characters like Mickey Mouse have existed for years but up until now there was no way to buy licenced apparel for your kids. Now all of a sudden they decide to open retail locations but at the same time they open an official online store as well as decide to sell on Amazon. What do you think will happen?

There will potentially be a huge backlog of orders for Pleasant Goat and Big, Big Wolf merchandise. The eventual goal is to have 1,100 locations open, but they won't all be open overnight. That means if people want to buy the merchandise chances are they will have to order online either through the official online store or the Taobao one as there likely won't be a store near them for several months or years.


5) Fireswirl is one of China's fastest growing companies

Fireswirl's subsidiary XCXD was named as one of China's top 21 emerging enterprises by the China Enterprise "Stars of the Future" Assembly 2011. As this honour took place during the summer, the distinction was awarded prior to the contracts with SLE or Casio. During a bullish market, it would be expected that a stock in Fireswirl's position would be trading at 10 times or more of their current sales. But that is far from reality, which leads to the most important point as to why FSW is significantly undervalued and a tremendous buy at these prices.


6) Despite all the exciting growth prospects, the stock can be obtained for pennies on the dollar

Refer here for FSW's key financial statistics

FSW's closing price for today of 11.5 cents puts the market cap at only $5.1M, which is less than their Q3 revenue of $6M. The last four quarters produced $21.7M in revenue, meaning their trailing 12-month price to sales figure is only 0.24. Compare that to similar Venture tech sector companies like INT or PYN which have market caps much greater than 10 times of Fireswirl's at just a fraction of the revenue.

PYN's trailing 12 month revenue figure is $2.2M but has a market cap of $69.5M for a Price to Sales ratio of 31.8, meaning FSW is over 130 times cheaper relative to PYN. Even mature industry players like Amazon.com Inc at 1.9 P/S or eBay Inc. at 3.55 P/S have P/S figures that would imply Fireswirl should be at a price that's well north of $1.

Fireswirl Technologies trades on the TSX Venture under the symbol FSW or in the US OTC under the symbol FRWRF.pk.

PYN on the TSX Venture currently trades at a P/S ratio of 31.8. If Fireswirl were to trade at a similar P/S ratio, its stock price would be $15.49.

AMZN on the NASDAQ trades at a P/S of 1.9. If Fireswirl were to trade at a P/S of 1.9, it would be trading at 93 cents.

FSW is about 10 times undervalued relative to large, slower growing online retail peers like Amazon and eBay and is over 100 times undervalued relative to its peers in the fast-growing TSX Venture tech stock sector.

Sunday, 18 September 2011

A 2.5x to 15x Undervalued Canadian Tech Stock

Read onwards for a tech stock that:

Has a solid business relationship with Yahoo!

Has quarterly revenues that exceeds its entire market cap and has a positive EBITDA that saw strong quarter over quarter growth

Is deeply discounted from its share price early in the year thanks to depressed revenue guidance that was greatly exaggerated at the time yet the stock price remains cheap while revenues are stronger than expected.

Has a price to cash flow of 1.2x and an EV/EBITDA of 3.9x and it is NOT a dying, debt-laden oil company like Compton Petroleum, Connacher O&G or OPTI Canada.

And finally, it recently came to a resolution with its subsidiary's lenders at extremely favourable terms that ensures the company's prosperity going forward   

After correctly calling a buyout of Afexa in my last blog post, I have decided to move on after selling out at over 70 cents. I'm also glad I moved out of Sino-Forest. I bought TRE in the 2's and sold in the 5's, both before and after its move over $8. So you could say I sold too early AND a bit late. But at least I'm rid of my shares before the thing got halted. Like Afexa, I believe Sino-Forest will get bought out at some point, but I don't wish to wait around for months for the dust to settle on it when there are so many great opportunities out there, particularly the one I'll speak about below.

The company that has caught my eye is Cyberplex Inc, symbol CX on the TSX or CYPXF on the pinksheets in the US. In the simplest terms it's a company with over 300 popular websites over a range of interests which has advertising revenue on those websites as a primary source of income. For all the Intertainment Media lovers reading this, it's more or less the same kind of business plan as INT except the websites have been running for a lot longer and aren't nearly as faddish as what INT appeared to be over the first half of this year. And they actually have tens of millions in revenue.

If you think about it, CX would be a prime target for INT. CX has a ton of revenue and websites (that primarily run in English). INT has a lot of cash from their $1.20 PP a few months ago and are looking for acquisitions. There's a lot of synergies to be had if a business combination took place between these two and this acquisition would immediately give INT credibility as they would have substantial social media and other online revenue. From Cyberplex's news release updating its strategic focus for 2011:

""Following recent meetings with Yahoo!, we are very encouraged that our partnership with Yahoo! remains strong," said Geoffrey Rotstein, CEO. "As we continue to adapt to this new marketplace, we have a partner who is both willing and able to work with us to get us back on track to execute on our strategy and deliver great results for Yahoo!'s advertiser base."

As a result of the issues raised by the integration and the changes to the marketplace, the Company will focus its efforts in 2011 on enhancing its traffic acquisition strategies, with less concentration on creating new websites."


While the business relationship with Yahoo! is getting back on track, the focus on traffic acquisition is right up the alley of INT.

On Friday CX broke out of its chart doldrums, increasing 10% on heavy volume and for very good reason. It came to an agreement between its subsidiary Tsavo Media, and its lenders at extremely favourable terms for the company.

The highlights of the agreement is as follows:

"1. Payment structure for the remaining Principal will be based on a variable repayment program linked to Tsavo Media's earnings over the remaining term, mitigating risks associated with possible volatility in the search marketplace;

2. Principal amount owing under the Credit Agreement has been reduced by $2.5 million;

3. Interest rate on the remaining Principal has been reduced by 100 basis points;

4. Maturity date under the Credit Agreement has been extended by over 20 months; and

5. Financial covenants have been reset to conservative levels with additional cure rights to protect against any potential future disruptions."

All 5 of these points are incredibly positive for the company. Based on 134M shares outstanding, the $2.5M reduction in the debt alone would intrinsically mean the stock should rise nearly 2 cents. The extension on the date that the debt is due and the reduction in interest payments sees tremendous improvement on the company's balance sheet and income statement going forward. Even with the strong rise, the company's stock price is a mere 10.5 cents, leading to a market cap of $14M while the 52-week high and low is 56 cents and 8.5 cents respectively.

To understand why the stock price is where it is, we have to look at the news that landed it there in the first place. On January 11, 2011, the stock price dropped from 48 cents to 23 cents based on the Fourth Quarter Update released the previous day. From the Cyberplex Fourth Quarter Update:

"Following the second quarter of 2010, the Company provided second half of 2010 guidance, wherein revenues were expected to be in the range of $75 to $85 million, with adjusted EBITDA expected within the range of $10 to $12 million. This guidance was subsequently affirmed upon the release of third quarter of 2010 financial results, when the Company expected to either meet or exceed this guidance, depending on the impacts of Yahoo!'s transition to the Bing search platform during the month of December 2010.

"Although the Yahoo-Bing integration has been ongoing for several months, during which time we were able to adapt well to the volatile environment, in mid-December we began to experience average revenue per click decreases and the strategies we customarily deploy for responding to such decreases were not as effective," said Geoffrey Rotstein, CEO.

The Company is still in the process of finalizing its annual financial information, but expects second half revenues to come in at the lower end of the guidance range previously provided. The lower end of the range is the direct result of the declining revenue per click experienced since mid-December. In addition, the Company expects that adjusted EBITDA for the second half of 2010 similarly would be at the lower end of the range and may be further impacted by one-time adjustments currently being evaluated.

With respect to the impact on financial performance for 2011, no additional information can be provided until the situation has been clarified. The Company remains in discussions with Yahoo! and expects to issue further releases and updates to the market as it gains better visibility into the issues and the results of its ongoing efforts."


Now let's see, before this news release, the company was trading at 48 cents, or a $64M market cap. They were expected to have revenues of $85M and an EBITDA of $12M for the second half of the year, with total year revenue and EBITDA being $115M and $13M respectively. The price to sales ratio was therefore around 0.56, already extremely cheap. The company has around $51M in debt and liabilities and $9M in cash so the total enterprise value at the time was ($64M+$51M-$9M) $106M. Divide that by $13M and you get an EV/EBITDA ratio of 8.2x, a very decent ratio for a small and growing tech company.

The company didn't provide any guidance for 2011 because of the issues they faced, but its fair to assume investors expected at least a 50% drop in revenues and EBITDA thanks to the average revenue per click decrease. Based on this fact you would have thought that the quarterly results for the company would be somewhere between a comedy and a horror show, but if we review the Second Quarter Results:

"Total revenue for the quarter was $14.4 million, a decrease from the $18.2 million recorded in the same quarter of 2010, and adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was approximately $812,000 as compared to $523,000 in the same period of 2010

  • Completed the integration of the EQ Ads platform into other leading advertising networks providing the capacity to reach over 8 billion daily impressions;
  • Secured engagements with a Canadian financial institution and a leading Canadian university to develop online marketing and audience development programs;
  • Continued to optimize technical algorithims and bidding strategies to address changes in the Yahoo!-Bing systems and revenue per click calculations;
  • Transitioned campaigns away from historical health and wellness clients and secured campaigns in the more established finance, education, group buying and online dating categories;
  • Developed mobile distribution capabilities to further enhance targeted search and customer acquisition initiatives into new distribution channels;
  • Continued to implement measures to ensure cost structure is aligned to the Company's current organization and requirements.
"The second quarter was quite a rebound for our organization, but it was just the beginning" said Ted Hastings, President of Cyberplex. "As we continue to execute on our strategy of growth and revenue diversification, we remain focused on providing advertisers with solutions across various forms of distribution, online, video and mobile."

The CEO stating that the quarter was a rebound is an understatement in my opinion. While revenue was down from Q2 2010, they actually beat EBITDA by 55%. That's quite a rebound. That shows prudent cost decreases and a successful focus on higher margin ventures. If we take a look at their SEDAR financial statement filing on August 12th, we see that January to June 2011 revenue was $29M vs $30.5M for the same period in 2010 so while revenue was down vs Q2 2010, it's still about flat for the first half of 2011 vs 2010. Hardly a disastrous position to be in as implied by the pummelled stock price. 

When viewing their financial statements, don't be worried by their negative earnings over the last few quarters. Their net loss is overstated thanks to the depreciation of intangible assets from decreasing the value of their various recent acquisitions. For instance their loss for Q2 2011 was $2M but their depreciation was $2.2M. If we look at full year 2010, both those lines run into the $60 million range. The fairest way to look at their earnings potential other than their EBITDA is the cash flow from operating activities. This was $2.3M for the first half of 2011 vs a cash outflow of $1M for the first half of last year.

Consider that last year's full year EBITDA ultimately landed at $13.3M (above guidance) and that cash flow from operations was $7.2M. If we look at a trailing 12-month view of the company, their cash flow from operations is $11.5M and their EBITDA is $13.5M. Their price to cash flow at current market price is only 1.2x. Their total debt and liabilities were $46M and cash $7.4M as of June 30th, so adding the liabilities and subtracting the cash from their market cap gives them an enterprise value of $52.6M. $52.6M/$13.5M is a trailing EV/EBITDA of merely 3.9. If we were to value the company at a 8.2x EV/EBITDA as they were at the start of the year, the enterprise value would be $110.7M. Less the $38.6M in net liabilities and you come up with a market cap of $72.1M. With 6.8M in options the fully diluted share count is 140.6M, meaning the price per share with a market cap of $72.1M would be 51 cents a share, right back near its 52-week high range.

Let's compare Cyberplex to a major internet player and their biggest source of revenue, Yahoo!. Review Yahoo's key statistics here. Yahoo! has an EV/EBITDA of 11.5 and a price to sales of 3.4. If we were to take a very conservative full year outlook of $60M in revenue for Cyberplex (basically a double of their first half revenue when they are seasonally skewed to the back half of the year), that would lead to a P/S of just 0.23. Applying the Yahoo! ratio of 3.4 to Cyberplex would assume a stock price of $1.53. This is from the most conservative revenue figure possible and applying a P/S from a mature company that does not have the growth prospects of Cyberplex. Even if you hated that argument, you cannot deny that the 0.56 P/S ratio at the start of the year is still more than 2 times greater than the 0.23. Even under the most pessimistic scenario for the company, it still should have a value that is nearly triple its current stock price.

If we were to use the Yahoo! EV/EBITDA number of 11.5x as a fair comparison, enterprise value for Cyberplex would be (11.5 x 13.5M) $155.3M. Subtract the net liabilities and you get a $116.7M market cap, or 83 cents a share.

If we were to value Cyberplex at an EV/EBITDA of 8.2x, similar to what they had at the start of 2011, the stock price would be 51 cents.

If we were to value Cyberplex at a P/S of 0.56, similar to what they had at the start of 2011, the stock price would be 25.5 cents.

If we were to value Cyberplex at an EV/EBITDA of 11.5x, similarly to Yahoo!, the stock price would be 83 cents.

If we were to value Cyberplex at a P/S of 3.4, similar to the P/S of Yahoo!, the stock price would be $1.53.


Under the most conservative scenario, the price of CX is still due for a 150% increase from its current price of 10.5 cents as the company successfully and favourably renegotiated its debt and has quickly evolved its business plan while maintaining revenues today and improving revenue growth prospects down the road.

On the upper end, Cyberplex would be a 1400% or more gainer for investors who bought at these depressed levels.It's a truly undervalued gem with a coherent business plan that results in significant revenues.

Monday, 18 July 2011

The Most Undervalued Canadian Biotech Stock

Read onwards for information about a biotech stock trading on the TSX that:

Has an interesting pipeline with recent FDA clearance

Is making money now and is particularly profitable when flu pandemic concerns arise

Is tightly traded for tremendous upside potential

And, most importantly, a near billion dollar Canadian pharmaceutical company bought a significant stake in the company at market price

After my successful trade of TRE from the $2's to my $5 target, I have been looking for a new stock to place those gains in addition to Futura Loyalty. And then I found the perfect one which has had a ton of excellent news over the last couple of days, and yet the price of the stock is still relatively capped at a little less than its 52-week high.

A lot of people have heard of Cold-FX. Its an herbal treatment to reduce the frequency and severity of colds and flu symptoms and is supported by the likes of Don Cherry. What many people might not know is that the parent company, Afexa Life Sciences Inc, trades on the TSX under the symbol FXA. Cold-FX has been an incredible seller for the company, as evidenced by their company year end financials. Despite having a market cap of just under $60M, their revenue for the past year was $40M with a slightly positive EBITDA and a slightly negative net income. These numbers in themselves would look great for a junior biotech company. But if we look at prior years' financials where the flu pandemic was at large, sales and profits were much higher. If concerns of a flu outbreak rise once again, sales of the product will increase.

Even if today's sales were 0, the company makes a very compelling case for it being valued at much higher than $60M market cap with their pipeline. Their goal is to become one of the first FDA-approved medicines in the polymolecular botanical drug category (a type of natural medication) and they took a significant step in that by gaining clearance for a Phase 1B clinical trial for AFX-2. The drug's goal is to help cure people with a type of Leukemia as outlined below:

"EDMONTON, ALBERTA -- Afexa Life Sciences Inc. (TSX:FXA) today announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization of a Phase 1B clinical trial of AFX-2 (CVT-E002™) as an Investigational New Drug (IND) in adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

The successful completion of this milestone for AFX-2 marks the initiation of the Company's strategy to obtain FDA approval as one of the first medicines in the polymolecular botanical drug category. The FDA clearance of this important initial step affirms the Company's regulatory, scientific, and quality capabilities in developing novel polymolecular medicines.

Although numbers vary, current estimates suggest approximately 130,000 individuals in the United States suffer from CLL. CLL is the most common type of leukemia, representing roughly one third of all leukemia cases in the U.S."

130,000 cases means 130,000 potential clients. A poster on Stockhouse put it very simply today. Although the math seems a little off, the idea is right. 130K clients spending $2K a year (a fair amount, but not financially impossible for someone who wishes to cure themselves) leads to $260M a year in revenue, much of that going straight to the bottom line. And remember the company trades at less than $60M in market cap. Of course there's a ton of biotechs out there that trade at similar market caps vs potential markets of their drugs. But the difference between them and FXA is that they heavily burn through cash and need venture capital investors who dilute the stock at low prices in order to remain liquid until they receive revenues. All Cold-FX needs to do is make enough money to offset the costs related to getting AFX-2 to market and we are looking at a company of $260M a year purely in profits.

I can write a fine story like this, telling you how undervalued this company is and you can choose to believe me. Or you can choose to believe Paladin Labs, a pharmaceutical company that has doubled its market cap over the past year to nearly $900M.

Refer to the Financial Post article here

Now, the article states that Paladin bought a stake in the Cold-FX maker Afexa, but logic stands to reason that they have researched AFX-2 and that's the reason why they bought shares at market. Reading the Financial Post article as well as Afexa's News Release with respect to the issue, you can see that Paladin bought shares indiscriminately up to 55 cents from the 30's. Do you think they intend to breakeven on those 55 cent purchases?

If you take a look at how the stock trades, you can see it is thinly traded and that just a small amount of volume can really move the stock. Paladin accounted for nearly all the volume on Friday July 15th, and less than 500K shares were responsible for a 20% leap in price on July 18th. The stock's jump is not the work of day traders or momentum players - yet. This is all based purely on significant investor purchases and positive news releases. Imagine what will happen once the day traders and momentum players get in on it. Remember when the Gene Simmons joining Ortsbo craze started? Originally INT's stock jumped from the 50's to low 70's before taking off to the $3's a couple of weeks later.

The difference between INT and FXA is that there is a strong chance that FXA would stay at those levels as Paladin's investment is likely just the first of many and that Afexa will end up being bought out by Paladin. You could say that I'm trying to start a buyout rumour, except that the Financial Post article already started it for me:

"Market watchers saw the buy as a hint that Paladin might eventually move to acquire a bigger stake in the Edmonton-based developer of naturally sourced supplements.

Douglas Loe, an analyst with Versant Partners, said in a research note Monday that it could signal a growing interest in the firm and was relatively positive about the prospect.

“Investment itself could be mildly positive to future earnings, since Afexa looks attractively valued to us,” he said."

Note the underlined part of the quote. This is not myself saying it, but an analyst. While FXA might be too small to gain coverage, the purchase from Paladin Labs and the positive view of this from an analyst shows you what they think of Afexa.

Investing in FXA means you're investing in a company with revenues today and huge future revenues tomorrow. They have a tremendous potential for a buyout and unlike other biotechs which invest in hard drugs with potentially severe side effects, Afexa's alternative medicine remedies may unleash a huge positive influence on society and the industry where people can actually improve their lives 100% through the use of drugs.

Thursday, 14 July 2011

The Next Big Canadian Tech Stock II

Refer to my first post here. Since then Futura Loyalty (TSXV:FUT) has stabilized in the 4 to 4.5 cent range, up from 3, while its industry counterparts INT, SCG and FSW have struggled.

FUT has greatly expanded its growth potential as it has completed partnerships with the auto dealer associations in Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia in addition to the one it has signed with TADA.

Recently FUT had its AGM. The Stockhouse poster Kings Kid was kind enough to post a detailed summary of the AGM on the message boards.

Read the summary of the AGM here

I will dissect certain parts of it here to provide further commentary on the positive outlook for Futura.

"Existing aeroplan mile revenue this year over last year’s goal was a 5% increase in total miles issued, there goal was to have a 90% retention rate of existing clients.  After first quarter they have increased the total miles 40%, and that is just from existing clients prior to TADA, in there Q1 results there was no revenue from dealerships.  We will start to see revenue from the TADA starting in Q2.  They have also retained 100% of their clients from 2011 for 2012."

The area I want to focus on here is the retention rate and how good this is relative to other businesses. My financial background in Canada is in the telecommunications industry. I know from experience that Bell, Rogers and Telus have churn rates of around 1.5% to 2% each MONTH for their wireless phone, TV and internet clients (a little less for landline phones). Meaning by the end of the year they lose over 20% of their customers. Futura had an aggressive goal of retaining 90% of their clients and they came back with having signed up ALL of their clients in 2011 for 2012 as well.

This is an extremely good sign for the business. It shows that clients find Futura's services useful and necessary, trust the company to provide those services to a high standard and also believes that the company will thrive. If Futura did not have a bright future, you would think at least one of their clients would cut ties and find an alternative way to provide a loyalty program to their customers. Think how many people stopped buying GM cars because they were worried about their financial troubles a few years ago and how that would affect issues like warranties and such.

Futura is B2B which makes it a little bit easier to retain clients, but even the business divisions of the telcos would love to retain 90% of their clients each year. And you can't even compare Futura's retention rate to something like INT. Who knows how many people used Ortsbo once and dropped it. Or the incredible rise and fall of a fad like Crocs, both in sales and in stock price. Futura is not promoting a fad or a novelty. Its promoting a real service needed by real companies to provide an improved customer retention experience. How many TSX Venture stocks with market caps less than $10 million can say that?

"Their profitability level is 128 dealers, this is reached by estimating that the avg dealer will sell about 40,000 miles per month.  For the avg dealer to reach the 40,000 miles per month they need to sell 1 car per month where miles are given and 3 service/tires per month where miles are issued.  (40,000 miles is equal to $2,000 revenue to FUT)  Numbers that seem very reasonable and achievable!  I also feel the number of 128 dealers is very achievable by the end of 2011, my guess is that, that number will be surpassed by the start of Q4 again this is just my opinion and not what I was told at the AGM, the number I would like to see my the end of the year and I think is very reasonable is 150 as the projected dealers by the end of the year are between 65 and 80 and I feel that is low, 80-90 is more realistic in my opinion."

This is an incredibly useful piece of information. The company has disclosed exactly where it will breakeven and how it will get there. It has 45 current/near future clients out of 300+ dealers associated with TADA after less than 6 months since the deal was signed. Now that it has signed up with three more associations, with two of them being of equal size to TADA, it's fair to expect that they can get 10-15% of those association members as their clients and triple their dealer count within 6 months, getting to their breakeven level. With all of INT's press releases with hundreds of different numbers and metrics, I have yet to see one where they disclose an estimate of their breakeven point.

"-Aeroplan refers all accounts under 50 locations to Futura that they receive interest from."

Out of all the points that impress me, this could be the most important one of them all with respect to long-term growth of Futura. In Part One to this blog post, I assumed that Groupe Aeroplan was merely compliant in the business of Futura, meaning that they would not actively engage in stealing clients away from them or compete in their market space. Now its confirmed that Groupe Aeroplan is actually ACTIVELY ENGAGED in promoting Futura's business to any client that is viewed as too small by AER. I'd be willing to guess that the vast majority of business devoid of a loyalty program at this stage are those business with less than 50 locations anyways.

Does Google Translator actively refer people to Ortsbo? Does Green Dot actively refer smaller or Canadian retail locations to SelectCore? No! At least not without an agreement and a referral fee sometime in the future. So who has the true competitive advantage here?

"- FUT is in 558 retail locations"

And remember, they managed to retain all of these in 2012. Its a lot easier to retain 10 clients than 558. If all 558 say yes (albeit some are chains which only need the approval of one manager) that's saying something about Futura's services.

"- FUT goal is to double last years overall areoplan sales in 2011 from 2010 total of 34,000,000"

No wonder AER likes them so much. This is not exactly chump change to them.

"-FUT has been talking with Ontario Dealers Association and has almost finalized deal"

Once this is done, Futura will have the inside track to providing loyalty services to over 75% of all dealers in Canada, with the last major hurdle being Quebec. According to this listing, there are nearly 2,000 dealers across Canada though I do not believe this is a complete list.

"-When asked FUT believes that they can be profitable by Q4 2011 or 2012 Q1 at the latest"

This comes in line with my point above that they will reach breakeven in another 6 months.

- FUT receives $.05/ mile in revenue

Again, more evidence of FUT disclosing real revenue numbers. A rarity for small cap Venture stocks.

So when you buy Futura Loyalty you buy a company on the Venture Exchange for less than $10M market cap that:

Has the support of 100% of its clients
Has a straightforward, transparent and achievable business plan
Clearly discloses exactly how it will get revenue and when it will breakeven
Has the direct support of a multibillion dollar company, Groupe Aeroplan

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

The Ultimate Sino Forest Conspiracy Theory - How Social Media Can Create a Reverse Pump and Dump

Sino Forest Corp (TSX:TRE) is the hottest (or coldest, depending on which way you look at it) stock trading in Canada right now. At the moment of this writing in sits in the $2.30's, down over 90% from its March highs, with much of that loss coming due to the infamous Muddy Waters report at the beginning of June.

I won't go into details since if you are reading this you probably know the details already. But I will provide my own insight based on the players involved. Remember this is just my own opinion.

There's a few questions you need to ask yourself before going on.

Before you started to follow TRE, have you ever heard of Carson Block?
Before you started to follow TRE, have you ever heard of John Paulson?
Do you understand the business of TRE and all of its relationships in China?

Once you ask yourself these questions you might realize you know very little about the people involved in orchestrating one of the biggest unfounded tanks of a stock in history. Is TRE a fraud? No one knows for sure but there are clues that point to it not being one:

Sino-Forest Accepts China Development Bank Corporation Term Loan Offer of US$50 Million to Fund Planting Plan

Something tells me that the China Development Bank Corporation wouldn't loan money to a complete scam of a company just a couple of months prior to the Muddy Waters report. I'm just throwing this out there but I somehow think that maybe, just maybe, a government organization for the country in which Sino does business might understand Sino's complex business relationships that conform to Chinese business practices a little bit better than Mr. Block. And they would likely be more apt at confirming Sino's forestry holdings and cash balances in China than the Globe & Mail.

Sino has also been around since the mid-90's, much longer than the China RTOs that are under fire for fraud. Although there are Madoffs out there, it's a lot harder to fake a scam over 15 years that it is for 3 or 4. Sino managed to survive the crash of 2001 and 2008, both of which were prime eras for finding out frauds so that's saying something there.

So who will you believe? A company that's survived through two market crashes and has E&Y as an auditor without being found as a fraud or some guy named Carson Block that you never heard of until a few weeks ago?

I'll get to my conspiracy theory. With the rise of social media, it's easier than ever to pump a stock, see LEXG. It also seems even easier to tank one since people's fear is a lot greater than people's greed in stock market psychology. *Someone could* have paid Mr. Block to write a report about Sino. Sino's not a fraud but it is so complex that no one actually bothers to check up on the details of their business and they just throw support one on top of the other in some kind of group think reaction - Paulson, Dundee, RBC etc. As soon as they see Block's report, they can't confirm or deny it immediately. Anybody with an interest in getting those Chinese forestry holdings cheaply could easily take advantage of that.

I know how the investment industry works. These analysts spend 12 hours a day on average at work, 8 hours a day drinking and have 4 hours a day of sleep. Do you think they have time or willingness to research every nook and cranny of Sino? No! They are just going to jump ship like rats and suspend coverage pending further review from PWC as soon as possible so they are the first in line to announce they are jumping ship and have the least amount of egg on their face. The analysts from BMO and RBC are dancing around, explaining to their bosses that "at least I'm not Richard Kelertas from Dundee", who sounds REALLY bad right about now. They could care less about what happens to Sino. This is part 2 of the Sino conspiracy theory, although I don't believe they are intentionally involved.

Part 3 involves Mr. Paulson. *Someone* out there knew that he owned nearly 35 million shares and was licking their chops at the thought of where this stock will head if they could convince him to sell. Now if he is anything like the analysts, he too probably does not fully understand Sino's business and relies on the musings of Mr. Block (whose intentions we don't know at all) or the analysts (who are just busy trying to cover their own asses). Once he is convinced to sell, the whole house of cards on the stock price falls.

Review the price and volume history of the stock here. Paulson likely didn't trade on the US pinksheets but some trades might have gone through the ATS systems which won't show up here. But assuming they all went through the TSX, the stock traded just over 250M shares from June 1st through 17th. 35M of those are Paulson's. The rest are a mix of scared retail investors selling and knife catching retail investors buying.

The Muddy Waters report has been incredibly successful, taking the stock all the way down to $1.29. I'm sure most of that is retail investors who bought and sold for more than 50% losses in a matter of a few days.

Now what do you think will happen? That *someone* who could have paid Block to write the report can now buy Sino for $1-$2 billion instead of paying $6 billion. Because the shares have turned over so much, the majority of current shareholders like me have a very low average cost, likely well under $5. For instance, my average cost is $2.31 after starting my buying spree at $2.80 early this week. If $2 billion is offered that's around $8 a share and current shareholders will be ecstatic to approve the deal.

Because the company was complacent and management put up a very weak fight, that is enough to avoid the lawyers who are suing the company on behalf of the shareholders who bought north of $20. Who knows, maybe management was also paid off by this *someone* to keep their mouths shut as much as possible and let the stock tank.

If this scenario is indeed true and the company is found to be on the up and up, there is no legal recourse against it since it was never in the wrong and did try to defend itself (very weakly) against Muddy Waters and the Globe and Mail. There's no recourse against Block because he puts disclaimers in his reports. There are no claims against Paulson since he was just acting in the best interest of his own funds. And there are no claims against the analysts because they all jumped ship like rats and suspended coverage pending the PWC report.

I am fairly certain the company will not be around in time for the report from PWC. It will be bought out by then for something slightly north of $5. Your only recourse as a retail investor in my opinion is to buy now for an easy double or to average down below $5 to recover your losses. Like I said, this is just my opinion and I could be wrong. But if you read my argument carefully you can see how my conspiracy theory could actually be right.